<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beautiful Waterfalls</title>
	<link>http://thecontaminated.com/beautiful-waterfalls/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: LITI</title>
		<link>http://thecontaminated.com/beautiful-waterfalls/#comment-5905</link>
		<author>LITI</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 07:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thecontaminated.com/beautiful-waterfalls/#comment-5905</guid>
		<description>just wow !
this helped me a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just wow !<br />
this helped me a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foo</title>
		<link>http://thecontaminated.com/beautiful-waterfalls/#comment-3031</link>
		<author>foo</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thecontaminated.com/beautiful-waterfalls/#comment-3031</guid>
		<description>Regardless of the exposure time, images of running taps wouldn't be so spectacular, would they 'DJ'?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of the exposure time, images of running taps wouldn&#8217;t be so spectacular, would they &#8216;DJ&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://thecontaminated.com/beautiful-waterfalls/#comment-2994</link>
		<author>DJ</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 07:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thecontaminated.com/beautiful-waterfalls/#comment-2994</guid>
		<description>The waterfalls look like that (beautiful and kinda misty) because of the way the photographer  set the camera settings. I'm in a digital photography class in school and we just recently learned about this. Its all about how the camera captures the speed of the water. There is a setting on all cameras that you can change to capture the fastest motions (so that they are not blurred) or to capture the not so fast motions. To get the misty effect, you change the setting to somewhere in the middle of the overall choices. It gives the water a misty effect. So in reality if you looked at these waterfalls, these would just look like normal waterfalls, nothing real special or unique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The waterfalls look like that (beautiful and kinda misty) because of the way the photographer  set the camera settings. I&#8217;m in a digital photography class in school and we just recently learned about this. Its all about how the camera captures the speed of the water. There is a setting on all cameras that you can change to capture the fastest motions (so that they are not blurred) or to capture the not so fast motions. To get the misty effect, you change the setting to somewhere in the middle of the overall choices. It gives the water a misty effect. So in reality if you looked at these waterfalls, these would just look like normal waterfalls, nothing real special or unique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Booto</title>
		<link>http://thecontaminated.com/beautiful-waterfalls/#comment-2990</link>
		<author>Booto</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 05:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thecontaminated.com/beautiful-waterfalls/#comment-2990</guid>
		<description>so beatuiful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so beatuiful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
