Menu

Advertising

Friends

Previous Post: « Peugeot Moovie Concept

Next Post: Aptera - Aerodynamic Three Wheeler »

Earth At Night - Continents

  • Author: Administrator
  • Filed under: Cool Stuff
  • Date: Mar 7,2008

Beautiful photographies of Earth taken from space. Pictures of the Earth’s continents are really amazing.

earthatnigh asia picture

earthatnight africa picture

earthatnight america photo

earthatnight antartica photo

earthatnight australia photo

earthatnight europe photo



Previous Post: « Peugeot Moovie Concept

Next Post: Aptera - Aerodynamic Three Wheeler »

78 Responses for "Earth At Night - Continents"

  1. gunnerrs March 7th, 2008 at 9:41 pm

    i think those are google earth pick

  2. Walt March 7th, 2008 at 11:33 pm

    Pretty cool!

  3. wii March 7th, 2008 at 11:46 pm

    Thats soo fake!!

  4. chris March 7th, 2008 at 11:50 pm

    whoa intense

  5. Your name March 7th, 2008 at 11:57 pm

    PHOTOSHOPPED!

  6. Darmok March 8th, 2008 at 12:18 am

    These are clearly not photographs. No clouds are present, and we have no spacecraft in position to take such photographs (near-Earth orbits like the ones our satellites occupy are too close to Earth to capture an entire hemisphere; geostationary satellites are further but only orbit over the Equator). I would guess these were generated in Celestia or a similar program.

  7. victor March 8th, 2008 at 12:18 am

    uhh, one of your pictures has “antartica” as a caption, i believe that’s the north pole considering antarctica isn’t actually connected to any other continents…

    :)

  8. Dave March 8th, 2008 at 12:43 am

    If these are from space then where is the sun? If these are real then where is earth’s atmosphere and weather?

    These are just computer simulations, they aren’t real pictures.

  9. Andrew Kramer March 8th, 2008 at 12:55 am

    Hey! say thanks to daddy!

  10. Bob March 8th, 2008 at 12:55 am

    Taken from space? These are TEXTURES taken from space, the non-cloudy ones stitched together and mapped onto a sphere. And the lights look like they’re just point sprites. A real-life snapshot wouldn’t really look like this. You’d barely be able to make out the continents in the darkness and the lights would be a much softer golden-reddish color, becoming much harder to spot towards the horizon where the line of sight cuts through a great deal of atmosphere.

  11. someone March 8th, 2008 at 1:06 am

    Do you really believe this is how Earth looks like from space at night?

  12. Bryan March 8th, 2008 at 1:39 am

    Obviously these are not really photographs of the earth, though they may be based upon such photographs. So many things wrong, but probably the first clue is that there are no clouds…

  13. HardwareKid March 8th, 2008 at 1:47 am

    That looks amazing, pretty much shows you the places on earth that have the densest population. Take a look at the difference between Europe and North Africa…

  14. Anthony March 8th, 2008 at 1:52 am

    That picture is something…it makes you wonder whats holding the earth up in space…I know its gravity but it still amaze me.

  15. i love the earth March 8th, 2008 at 2:07 am

    breathtaking

  16. Rico Detroit March 8th, 2008 at 2:30 am

    The one labelled “Antarctica” is actual a picture of the North Pole and Arctic area.

  17. AS March 8th, 2008 at 2:45 am

    I can’t believe that even after making it into the front page of digg nobody has brought up the fact that the image of ‘antartica’ is incorrect. That is the Artic (North Pole), not Antartic (South Pole).

  18. sickmind fraud March 8th, 2008 at 3:29 am

    These are great as pieces of art. These are graphics and composites, and in fact they are impossible as straight photos, because of the missing clouds, and other details

    For example the Northern Hemisphere shot is completely impossible because the Sun is never 100% absent from the Northern hemisphere. It is a work of art., and should not be presented as natural photographs/

  19. Daniel March 8th, 2008 at 3:44 am

    Not real pics taken from space, but impressive indeed.

  20. Pindlebot March 8th, 2008 at 3:53 am

    This looks like Google Earth and not satellite photos….

  21. Yeah Right March 8th, 2008 at 3:54 am

    Amazing.. it doesn’t seem like there’s a cloud anywhere on earth. Must have been taken on one of those days when the sun had set on both hemispheres at the same time. The stars don’t move either.

  22. sen March 8th, 2008 at 4:19 am

    why do people even try this. how can all the places be in dark all the time… horrible work of photoshop

  23. James Mullin March 8th, 2008 at 4:38 am

    Great pictures! Pictures of this type really drive home where the economic areas of activity of the world are located!

    Since I live in the United States, guess which picture I’m going to add to my wallpaper collection. :)

    By the way, your form field is too short for my complete email address.

  24. Shree March 8th, 2008 at 6:06 am

    Great snaps…Wish I could see the real scene from the space…must be looking amazing :)

  25. doubting thomas March 8th, 2008 at 6:37 am

    if these were taken from space, wouldnt (at the VERY least) the stars in the background be different? or is the earth the only body that rotates in the universe?

  26. eddy March 8th, 2008 at 7:17 am

    This isn’t taken from space, it’s taken with Google Earth, a composite of mostly high-zoom satellite photos. Earth doesn’t look like this from space at night. Even if there were no clouds.

  27. Nurlan March 8th, 2008 at 7:31 am

    great

  28. ted March 8th, 2008 at 9:34 am

    this is computer generated. how come there are no clouds of the whole earth?
    misleading

  29. defunker March 8th, 2008 at 9:39 am

    This looks like the xplanet night images.

  30. dsvid March 8th, 2008 at 10:28 am

    bullshit. There is no way the lights would even be like this. Scandiavia isn’t that populated. There would only be glowing bits around Göteborg, Stockholm, Oslo etc.

  31. ian March 8th, 2008 at 10:41 am

    this isnt real… who do you think to the photos you idiot

  32. Wrong March 8th, 2008 at 10:46 am

    They’re not taken from Space, they’re a 3D model with satellite textures…

  33. lol March 8th, 2008 at 11:52 am

    lol

  34. Goran March 8th, 2008 at 1:33 pm

    Most beautifull planet in our solar system ;)

  35. eatfrog March 8th, 2008 at 2:26 pm

    obviously fake pictures.

  36. This is Bullshit March 8th, 2008 at 2:35 pm

    Anyone ever heard of “google earth?”

  37. vkiningham March 8th, 2008 at 2:48 pm

    No clouds, no sunlight on any side of the planet ? Faked or a composite, and by the looks of it from Google earth with the night layer on.

  38. dai March 8th, 2008 at 4:00 pm

    I believe this is manipulated picture of the NASA’s earth at night. Look at the stars.

  39. subcorpus March 8th, 2008 at 5:47 pm

    amazing …

  40. sookyung March 8th, 2008 at 7:14 pm

    lol.. when i saw this, what i thought was light pollution.. beautiful aside, this means we on earth can’t enjoy those amazing nightsky due to all the citylights.. ^^

  41. Spartan-117.5 March 8th, 2008 at 7:37 pm

    It looks just like the Halo 3 matchmaking background :)

  42. stejules March 8th, 2008 at 7:48 pm

    amazing thanx for this nice pics, we started to see the world from outside this is a new view , dunno if this is what we want leave the planet, but ok maybe we must leave it!

  43. TA March 8th, 2008 at 7:48 pm

    That’s just Google Earth.

  44. hey March 8th, 2008 at 7:48 pm

    Hey, you have a picture titled as antarctica…it’s actually the arctic. Hard to see in the dark, is it?

  45. Bob March 8th, 2008 at 8:11 pm

    Photographs? You have to be kidding right?

  46. shaun March 8th, 2008 at 8:21 pm

    quite something. so what organization assembled these? it takes a while to put together photos of earth sans clouds, and earth has apparently been pasted in space. or is it from an enthusiast applying the nasa image to a sphere?

  47. gaines March 8th, 2008 at 8:38 pm

    These aren’t taken from space–they’re just rendered images.

  48. eric y March 8th, 2008 at 8:48 pm

    we should find a way to inhabit that dead space at the bottom of our planet. jay whitlow, eric y, and sammie volunteer to be the first to build a McDonald’s and a WalMart at the South Pole.

  49. Pharmakeus March 8th, 2008 at 8:51 pm

    Looks like earth has contracted some sort of skin disease

  50. fromojoe March 9th, 2008 at 12:45 am

    I would nice if they had these in ultra high def photos that I could put on my desktop….Instead I get a 800 px by 600 px photo that would fit nicely on my 9 inch high def monitor…..Just got to figure out where I put my 9 inch monitor….ooopss…I threw it away like 10 years ago..!!!!!!!!!

  51. Anon March 9th, 2008 at 4:32 am

    Australia is pretty dark, doesn’t seem right..

  52. grigor March 9th, 2008 at 5:00 am

    Sorry to burst your bubble(s), but these aren’t photographs. They nothing more than crappy mockups.

  53. Crabsinmypants March 9th, 2008 at 5:22 am

    Where is the South America pics?

    Even the North Pole is loved more then south Americans

  54. Charles March 9th, 2008 at 10:30 am

    photoshopped

  55. Jeff March 9th, 2008 at 6:53 pm

    Hmmm… I suppose a polar orbiting satelite could have taken these pictures, but if so, how could all of the background stars be the same in every view?

  56. John March 9th, 2008 at 9:55 pm

    Google Earth anyone? Not that impressive. I thought it would be real pictures not generated ones.

  57. waterworld March 10th, 2008 at 4:59 am

    Correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t the fourth picture of the north pole (the Artic Ocean) and not Antarctica, as it’s named?

  58. Kraigatron March 10th, 2008 at 7:24 am

    The fourth picture down is the north pole. And it’s spelled Antarctica. just saying.

  59. Solomon March 10th, 2008 at 11:53 am

    Beautiful pictures. They really show the difference between those who have, and those who haven’t.

  60. Albert March 10th, 2008 at 7:53 pm

    FAKE

  61. Joe Dickhead March 10th, 2008 at 8:08 pm

    FAKE!

    Where are the clouds?

  62. deejay March 10th, 2008 at 9:10 pm

    too bad these aren’t real photographs. its just GIS data with white points showing areas of dense population. boo.

  63. Canuck March 11th, 2008 at 12:58 am

    The 4th one is not Antarctica, you can clearly see North America and Europe.

  64. Pops March 11th, 2008 at 2:19 am

    Interesting…no clouds

  65. chemical_echo March 11th, 2008 at 6:14 am

    The picture titled Antarctica is the North Pole; not Antarctica.

  66. Andy March 11th, 2008 at 1:35 pm

    So your telling me that at the point these pictures were taken there wasn’t a single cloud in the sky?

  67. Your name March 11th, 2008 at 5:46 pm

    These aren’t real photos. They must be pieced together from dozens of photos taken over a period of time. There are no clouds people.

  68. tron March 11th, 2008 at 6:57 pm

    i agree, not only because of the lack of clouds, but because i dont think night time ever fell on north America, Europe, and Asia at the same time… still kinda cool tho i guess

  69. bc March 11th, 2008 at 7:50 pm

    these photos are bs as uninhabited areas of the world have lights out the ying yang, and lightly populated areas look like major metro areas. complete dumb ass’ made this

  70. Ryan Connor March 12th, 2008 at 7:51 am

    These are nice pics if they were real. Though the earth may be real with pieced together pics, I am pretty sure its a graphical art. the lights on the planet from that distance would not be visible and the stars in the background are for sure added in digitally. The lights you see can be added as an overlay, but themselves are not really lights. I believe its taken with a radioscope that simulates what it would look like had the lights been visible to the naked eye.
    Lastly the earth is not purple at night. Its pitch black on the night side taken with any camera.
    there are plenty of pictures of space stuff that are altered or just a digital art. alot of what you see in space pictures is even just something like what an xray machine can see and then its colored to look pretty. I know all about pictures. I am a photographer, digital designer, videographer/filmaker, and i have studied and still study astronomy and geology and phsyics and things of that nature. I dont know it all, but I have enough knowledge and education to say what i have said.

  71. jak March 18th, 2008 at 4:05 pm

    what’s wrong with you guys? so what if it’s fake? the main point of these pictures is to show how e earth is populated and distribution of the people. Australia is only mostly populated at the fringes, thus the darkness in the middle.

    even national geog has used these pictures in their atlas. so why are you all so worked up over them?

    geez.

  72. arlene March 19th, 2008 at 11:46 am

    it does look like google earth
    its look pretty when your viewing
    night zone

  73. Ralph April 7th, 2008 at 7:12 pm

    The above images are actually composites of hundreds of pictures made by the orbiting DMSP satellites.

  74. Cosmo naught April 27th, 2008 at 11:50 am

    Those photos very fake… Americans must be stupid.

    Like all Russians I have my chance make recent voyage into space in glorious Soyuz capsule I snap this photo of what Earth really look like in space at night.

    http://portunus.net.nz/rtfm/erf.png

  75. Guy April 28th, 2008 at 6:46 pm

    You @!#$#*) idiots… have any of you ever heard of telescopes?? So what if there are no clouds? It’s called magnification. These shots could easily have been taken THROUGH the clouds. It’s called modern technology. Combine that with a composite of thousands of pictures, and voila! You get these pics. Saying that they’re pictures in this sense is not wrong. And I don’t see the part where the post says that each of these is a SINGLE picture… sometimes I wonder if there’s any intelligence at all on the internet…

  76. Man May 1st, 2008 at 3:26 am

    The images shown aren’t magnifed, they’re reduced, so it has nothing to do with telescopes or magnification at all.

    There’s no satellite in existence that can see through clouds, the images shown are rendered from NASA’s “Campfires” images, which in turn are modified versions of their “Visible Earth” series, so at least you were right about something.

    However the Visible Earth images are taken in daylight and assembled from carefully chosen images and edited by hand to rid the resulting map of any cloud cover that might remain. No high-tech wizardry somehow made them invisible and to suggest that is insulting to the people who spent time compiling and editing the images by hand.

    For someone who goes around calling other people idiots, I’m surprised you didn’t notice that in addition to there not being any clouds, there is some kind of backlight illuminating the Earth, The world doesn’t glow from within, so what is lighting it up? The answer is nothing, the dark side of the Earth is pitch black. The images on this page were created from day images and the lights were added by hand.

    The blurb describes the images as “photographies”, they are clearly not photographs, so you’re wrong again. Asserting your own intellect aggressively while being consistently wrong yourself is a sign that you’re naive, and don’t realize how much you don’t know. How old are you? 12?

  77. lilly May 3rd, 2008 at 6:50 pm

    looks real tight

  78. Pandey Asheesh May 4th, 2008 at 2:21 pm

    How is it possible that no clouds are there in the entire continents ? Anyway, its a good piece of art performed on satelite pictures.


Leave a comment


Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

<