Posted by Administrator in Cool Stuff on 03 20th, 2008 | 38 responses
Those computer station are really cool and amazing. If you have a lot of money and time you can spend it to make something which will look like on those sets. Take a look at those weird and cool pictures of those geeky computer sets.
More monitors with M$ Windows, means more errors at a time, so.. whats the point?
U can have the same desktop space with 2 apple cinema displays, one powerful computer, Mac OS, and no errors or BSD’s, with the same cost of those pcs..
Remember, even when u sum 3, 4, 8 mustangs cobra, u can’t beat one Ferrari.
lame stations are lame… Two / Three Monitors is enough.. You can’t possibly need 4 monitors.. Not to mention most of those setups are two monitors per computer.. If you kids were smart you would have 4 per each computer (using SLI dual cards) But being you don’t watercool your computers your fans would burn up and the heat would melt your fail minds.
Those are sweet. So what I would like to know next is how many machines are running each of these multi-screen set-ups? I mean 6 - 16 monitors on one machine would be hellacious.
I really don’t see the point of having more than 2 screens, it is great to be able to play a game while having a browser open on the other screen but 7 screens I think its a waste of money looks nice nonetheless
Any information about what these setups actually are? eg. how many machines are running vs. number of monitors. That net of older boxes with the CRT nestled inside looks especially cool. What are the specs of the boxes? What are the means of distributing instructions across the net?
pretty crazy. i’d like to know what kinda jobs these guys are doing - i know myself personally would top off at around 3 or 4 screens, but i only do design.
The only “geeky” configuration is the fourth, that is propably a rendering farm. The others are just eye candy as mentioned. There are lots of people around the world that think that connecting a computer to a TV through s-video is very nerdy, so are those configurations above to me. All you need is couple of videocards or a network video stream software.
I have two monitors but have used setups that have 4+ and you can be really efficient if you need it. I do a lot of video editing and 4 monitors comes in really handy.
I happen to support a guy’s network empire that he uses for stock trading. His desk has 7 24-inch LCD displays setup horizontally, and no desk in his office has less than 4 24-inch monitors. The entire network is Windows based, and I have yet to see a BSOD, crash, or error of any kind from any of his systems. All these geeks who thinks Linux is the only way you can do it just need to setup a Windows system properly.
What can be more exciting than online blackjack gambling, the player facing the dealer in an intense game of blackjack, gambling for the favour of Lady Luck ? If you want to give it a try, come on in and test luck and wits at our finest blackjack games !
March 21st, 2008 at 9:39 am
they would all look much cooler if they were running Linux - its what they use in the movies for setups like this!
March 21st, 2008 at 4:25 pm
uhhh, they are not real geeks. I don’t see any linux desktops there.
March 22nd, 2008 at 12:27 am
There is no way you can be that productive with so many monitors.
March 22nd, 2008 at 1:09 am
And i thought I was geeky
March 22nd, 2008 at 1:18 am
Why?
March 22nd, 2008 at 2:28 am
O_o
“… no words… they should have… sent… a poet!”
March 22nd, 2008 at 3:54 am
Epic geekasm!
March 22nd, 2008 at 5:08 am
More monitors with M$ Windows, means more errors at a time, so.. whats the point?
U can have the same desktop space with 2 apple cinema displays, one powerful computer, Mac OS, and no errors or BSD’s, with the same cost of those pcs..
Remember, even when u sum 3, 4, 8 mustangs cobra, u can’t beat one Ferrari.
March 22nd, 2008 at 5:16 am
lame stations are lame… Two / Three Monitors is enough.. You can’t possibly need 4 monitors.. Not to mention most of those setups are two monitors per computer.. If you kids were smart you would have 4 per each computer (using SLI dual cards) But being you don’t watercool your computers your fans would burn up and the heat would melt your fail minds.
March 22nd, 2008 at 6:37 am
This is why the earth is dying
March 22nd, 2008 at 6:44 am
Those are sweet. So what I would like to know next is how many machines are running each of these multi-screen set-ups? I mean 6 - 16 monitors on one machine would be hellacious.
March 22nd, 2008 at 8:20 am
You people are freaking insane!
March 22nd, 2008 at 9:16 am
Seems like the people who own this computers need a lot of money to maintain their hobby.
I wonder if somehting useful is made with this huge desktops systems.
March 22nd, 2008 at 9:44 am
wow this is a gamer PC :)))
March 22nd, 2008 at 10:58 am
Hey - here’s an idea - why not credit the sources of these pictures?
March 22nd, 2008 at 12:10 pm
Why do they are all Widnows machines???
March 22nd, 2008 at 1:08 pm
These setups are only for weird nerds. Normal people laugh and point at them.
March 22nd, 2008 at 2:11 pm
makes me want to become a stock broker…
March 22nd, 2008 at 2:20 pm
really cool, I’m thinking of buying six 22″LCD’s and making something like this myself
March 22nd, 2008 at 2:56 pm
Que flipaos!! Y ¿para que quiere 7 monitores una persona??
March 22nd, 2008 at 5:13 pm
why not just get a 50″ lcd….?
March 22nd, 2008 at 5:46 pm
I really don’t see the point of having more than 2 screens, it is great to be able to play a game while having a browser open on the other screen but 7 screens I think its a waste of money looks nice nonetheless
March 22nd, 2008 at 6:22 pm
Any information about what these setups actually are? eg. how many machines are running vs. number of monitors. That net of older boxes with the CRT nestled inside looks especially cool. What are the specs of the boxes? What are the means of distributing instructions across the net?
March 22nd, 2008 at 8:18 pm
These are kind of tame by geek standards. Multiple monitors don’t make you a geek. A desk shaped like the Enterprise with a captain’s chair may.
March 22nd, 2008 at 8:22 pm
I Agree with bob.
And why not just get a big T.V LCD with PC inputs ? Would it not be equal
March 22nd, 2008 at 9:34 pm
pretty crazy. i’d like to know what kinda jobs these guys are doing - i know myself personally would top off at around 3 or 4 screens, but i only do design.
March 23rd, 2008 at 12:27 am
I second that
March 23rd, 2008 at 4:26 am
it’s never enough is it
March 23rd, 2008 at 6:18 am
Booo for not crediting sources.
March 23rd, 2008 at 6:21 am
and where these pictures are taken and and who built these setups …
March 23rd, 2008 at 9:21 pm
ZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzz
March 24th, 2008 at 12:30 pm
Wow, they are really geeky!
March 25th, 2008 at 3:28 pm
Wow, this site it a joke.
March 28th, 2008 at 5:59 pm
5 pc’s 5 wow’s, guy is grinding instances by himself! =D
March 30th, 2008 at 7:07 pm
The only “geeky” configuration is the fourth, that is propably a rendering farm. The others are just eye candy as mentioned. There are lots of people around the world that think that connecting a computer to a TV through s-video is very nerdy, so are those configurations above to me. All you need is couple of videocards or a network video stream software.
April 3rd, 2008 at 8:49 pm
I have two monitors but have used setups that have 4+ and you can be really efficient if you need it. I do a lot of video editing and 4 monitors comes in really handy.
May 24th, 2008 at 2:28 am
Most of these dont look 2 geeky 2 me. Look at the speakers. Its a perfect gaming setup!
August 27th, 2008 at 2:07 am
I happen to support a guy’s network empire that he uses for stock trading. His desk has 7 24-inch LCD displays setup horizontally, and no desk in his office has less than 4 24-inch monitors. The entire network is Windows based, and I have yet to see a BSOD, crash, or error of any kind from any of his systems. All these geeks who thinks Linux is the only way you can do it just need to setup a Windows system properly.